Saturday, May 26, 2012

A Wrinkle in Time

 L’Engle, M. (1962). A wrinkle in time. USA: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.

(Copy of Lit Circle post for this title, part 1, first 6 chapters)

            A Wrinkle in Time is a chapter book of the modern fantasy genre.  Its events, settings, and characters are outside the realm of (known) possibility.  It is both science fantasy and a monomythic quest in which the beginning setting is a backdrop, establishing the at-first seemingly ordinary characters in an environment of home, family, neighbors, work and school, with real-world joys and problems.  Later, as the characters and story become more developed and involved, the settings change to unique fantastic locations integral to the plot, as the meaning of the foreshadowing tesseract term is revealed.  The story is told from the third-person-sympathetic point of view of Meg Murry, an awkward and “different” girl with a mouthful of braces who does not fit in with the herd.  She thinks of herself as ugly and unintelligent, and she is often at odds with herself and others because she is misunderstood for who she really is—a brilliant, caring individual who has beautiful eyes hidden behind her glasses.  Meg learns of real evil, The Black Thing, as she, along with her unusually intuitive little brother, Charles Wallace, and their friend, Calvin, are led by three mysterious space-and-time-traveling individuals, Mrs Whatsit, Mrs Who, and Mrs Which, on the quest to overcome IT, thus saving the world from the darkness of having everyone be the same as everyone else—and finding Meg’s father.

            I had not heard of this book before now, or if I had, I had forgotten.  Because the version I am reading was published in 2007 and 2011 by Square Fish, I did not notice until writing the reference note that it was originally published in 1962.  Ah!  That is why, being of a certain age, I felt a distinct familiarity beyond identifying with Meg’s adolescent angst: the fifth dimension (the dawning of the age of Aquarius, when peace will guide the planet and love will steer the stars), possibilities, non conformity, gender equality, rage against the machine, etc., and of course, ultimately saving the world from its own darkness.  (Where are my tie-dyes and flowered headband?)  It reaffirms that despite certain advances, young and old still face the same struggles compounded by new ones, and that the insight and wisdom--the spirit of the highest ideals in the radical paradigm shift that took place in the 1960s--still resonate.  I look forward to the rest of Meg’s journey through the coming chapters.

            Tweet for the end of Chapter 5: “And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.” (p. 100)

(Copy of Lit Circle post for this title, part 2, final 6 chapters)

            In the concluding half of A Wrinkle in Time, the action escalates through the frightening encounters of Meg, Charles Wallace, and Calvin, on the strange and dark planet of Camezotz.  Their conflicts are multiplied, culminating in the ultimate universal conflict of good versus evil—evil in the forms of the strange robot-like sameness of the people, the man with red eyes, and ultimately the terrifying antagonist IT at CENTRAL central intelligence, where they finally find Meg’s father.  Using their respective gifts, all are able to tesser away from Camezotz except for Charles Wallace, who was left behind for his own immediate well being.  Meg is nearly killed by the blackness while tessering.  With her consciousness recovering sooner than her body, she is in a horrifying state of hearing and feeling but being unable to respond in any effective way, which seems analogous to adolescent anxieties arising from the desperately painful need to interact and be “normal,” but being unable to graciously do so.

            As are all of the main characters, the strange creatures that inhabit the new planet of Ixchel are described in detail so that their physical appearance can be imagined by the reader.  Interestingly, these creatures are sightless.  They embody wisdom, warmth and love.  One in particular, Aunt Beast, nurtures Meg as she regains her strength.  For Meg, the experience of being cradled in love flashes back to when she was a baby being rocked in her mother’s arms.  Meg often comes across as a brat who compounds problems with her rude and hurtful outbursts.  Luckily for her, she is surrounded by others who understand and are more or less patient.  She is overjoyed at finding her father, but she is angry with him because he does not live up to her unrealistic, childish superhero expectations.  A text-to-self connection is that there comes a time when children usually grow to accept their parents, however wonderful or not, as fellow human beings with strengths, gifts, flaws, and limitations.  Meg is beginning that transformation, alongside her realization that being the same and being equal are two different things, and that evil articulates our fears and doubts and tells us lies. She is finding her happy medium.  At the end of this story, the reluctant heroine Meg is able to rescue her little brother, and eventually all the travelers return safely home with the exception of the Mrs Ws, who are immediately off to the next (book?) quest.  Do you suppose IT is angry and vengefully bellowing for having been successfully defied?

            Not being a fan of “scary” stories, and well beyond my time of intrigue with monsters (if ever I had one), the second half of A Wrinkle in Time, with the menacing red-eyed man-creature and the terribly repulsive IT, almost lost me—even though stories need contrastingly dreadful characters to motivate and illuminate the good.  One of the things that helped to maintain my perseverance was that the possessed, sinister Charles was embodied in the lovable Charles.  I trusted that Meg’s special little brother was still there and would eventually prevail.  This realization also enabled Meg to demonstrate her love of Charles’s essence to the degree that she overcame self-conflicts, mustered courage, and risked her life to save him, knowing he was an unwilling medium for the evil force--and if she did not save him, no one could.  She knew Charles, beyond his appearance when he exhibited strange-eyed evil.  I suspect that Calvin, who became more and more quiet in this part of the story, will realize a similar knowledge of Meg, if he hasn’t already, with his assigned task of taking care of her.

            Another text-to-self connection was that the Bible quotes throughout the story not only were profound but comforting.  They resonate with the story’s overarching theme of the power of Love.  For believers, the essence of our Biblical God is Love.  Biblical inclusions foreshadow that evil will not triumph.  It might be ironic that we are reading this book together with multicultural themes.  Non Christians would perhaps not appreciate and relate to Biblical references, in some instances exhibiting extremism to the point of having the book blacklisted in a “free” and multicultural (or totalitarian) society.  I feel certain that IT would do exactly that.  Contrastingly, if non Christian readers are open-mindedly seeking to understand things different from themselves, the resounding wisdom and beauty of Biblical (as well as other literary) quotes might lead to further investigation.         

            Some text-to-text connections are: 1) The dark planet of Camezotz reflects a more sinister revisiting of 1984, the adult novel written by George Orwell in 1949, in which the main character resists being controlled by the “mind police,” the totalitarian government and Big Brother, 2) Camezotz is an ironic name for the dark planet, a contrasting play on Camelot, the home base of Britain’s beloved King Arthur, who won loyalty from his subjects by loving and protecting them from evil rather than by controlling them with fear, and, 3) On a lighter note, a text-to-movie connection is that Camezotz inhabitants are not unlike those in The Truman Show, where all the people in Truman’s community except for himself are actors with scripts.   

            The big idea in this story might be Mrs Whatsit’s similie that human life is like the iambic pentameter of a sonnet, having strict form but complete freedom of choice regarding the content within the structure.  Question: What will you write in your life’s sonnet?

            Mark My Words: anticlimax, myopic, precipitously, propitious, talisman, pedantic, ominous, inexorable, omnipotent, miasma, periodic table, trepidation, despondency, permeating, reiterating.
            


            

No comments:

Post a Comment